Expression profiling of cervical cancers in I ndian women at different stages to identify gene signatures during progression of the disease

Cervical cancer is the second most common cancer among women worldwide, with developing countries accounting for >80% of the disease burden. Although in the West, active screening has been instrumental in reducing the incidence of cervical cancer, disease management is hampered due to lack of biomarkers for disease progression and defined therapeutic targets. Here we carried out gene expression profiling of 29 cervical cancer tissues from I ndian women, spanning International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics ( FIGO ) stages of the disease from early lesion (IA and IIA) to progressive stages (IIB and IIIA–B), and identified distinct gene expression signatures. Overall, metabolic pathways, pathways in cancer and signaling pathways were found to be significantly upregulated, while focal adhesion, cytokine–cytokine receptor interaction and WNT signaling were downregulated. Additionally, we identified candidate biomarkers of disease progression such as SPP 1, proliferating cell nuclear antigen ( PCNA ), STK 17A, and DUSP 1 among others that were validated by quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction ( qRT ‐ PCR ) in the samples used for microarray studies as well in an independent set of 34 additional samples. Integrative analysis of our results with other cervical cancer profiling studies could facilitate the development of multiplex diagnostic markers of cervical cancer progression. Cervical cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths among women in I ndia, yet it remains poorly characterized at molecular level. This study provides one of the largest molecular profiling efforts from this region involving cervical cancer tissues from well‐defined clinical stages to identify molecular signatures of disease progression, as well as identify novel biomarkers distinguishing early and advanced disease. We expect this study to serve as a template for larger studies, including those based on high‐throughput sequencing, to help develop robust biomarkers of disease progression and potentially identify actionable therapeutic targets.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/101800/1/cam4152.pd

Management of renal cell carcinoma with solitary metastasis

BACKGROUND: Distant metastasis are common in Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) nearly one forth of the patients have metastasis at presentation while another 50% develop metastasis during the follow-up. A small percentage of these are solitary metastasis. We describe survival after surgical excision or radiotherapy of solitary metastatic lesion from renal cell carcinoma PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1988–2001, 43 patients with solitary metastasis to different sites from renal cell carcinoma underwent either surgical excision or radiotherapy were analyzed. The solitary nature of the lesions was confirmed by investigations. All patients have had radical nephrectomy for the primary lesion. Survival analysis was carried out by Kaplan Meier Method. RESULTS: All solitary metastatic lesions were treated with intent of cure either by excision or radiotherapy. Of these, 13 patients had solitary metastasis at the time of presentation in whom 3-year overall median survival was 26 months. The survival of those who developed solitary metastases during follow-up after nephrectomy for primary was 45 months. The patients with long interval between diagnosis and development of metastasis, early stage and low grade of the primary tumor had better prognosis. CONCLUSION: Complete resection of either synchronous or metachronous solitary metastases from renal cell carcinoma is justified and can contribute to a long-term survival in this select group of patients

Impact of lymphoceles on organ at risk doses in patients undergoing adjuvant pelvic radiation for carcinoma cervix

Purpose: Lymphoceles form part of target volume during adjuvant radiation for cervical cancer. The impact of lymphocele on doses to adjacent organs at risk (OAR) has not been studied. The present study was designed to investigate the same. Methods: From January 2011- December 2013 all patients were evaluated for presence of postoperative lymphocele. Planned target volume (PTV) was generated with and without lymphocele volume. Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans were generated and dose to OARs was determined. The impact of lymphocele volume on OAR dose was determined by Spearman rank test and Wilcoxon sign rank sum test was performed to determine the impact of lymphocele on OAR dose. Results: A total of 11/93 patients had postoperative lymphoceles. Of these 63% were located in internal iliac region. The median lymphocele volume at simulation was 42.8 cc (range 6.4-105cc) and remained almost stable at 44 cc (range 3-100 cc) at fifth week of radiation. Negative correlation was observed between mean lymphocele volume and dose to bladder, rectum and bowel bag. Presence of lymphocele led to reduction in V30 and V40 of bladder (84 cc vs 77 cc, p = 0.004; 68 cc vs 63 cc; p = 0.01) and rectum (87 cc vs 80 cc, p = 0.0001; 73.5 cc vs 65 cc, p = 0.01) and V15 of bowel bag (843 cc vs 804 cc; p = 0.01). Conclusion: Presence of lymphoceles displaced OARs leading to reduction in high dose volumes of rectum and bladder

Are we making progress in curing advanced cervical cancer-again?

Major improvements in radiotherapy over the past two decades in the definitive treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer have significantly improved loco-regional control and survival, whereas little progress has been made with chemotherapy since the implementation of concomitant cisplatin 25 years ago. However, the randomized study INTERLACE (A phase III multicenter trial of weekly induction chemotherapy followed by standard chemoradiation versus standard chemoradiation alone in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer) of neoadjuvant chemotherapy presented recently, has shown significant improvement in survival with the use of six cycles of weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel. Although INTERLACE is yet to be published, neoadjuvant chemotherapy is already being advocated as the new standard, and studies are being designed with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation and brachytherapy as the standard arm. It is noteworthy that INTERLACE was initiated before the improvements in radiotherapy mentioned above were broadly implemented. The survival rate in the standard arm of INTERLACE was therefore inferior to the results obtained with the latest state-of-The-Art external beam radiotherapy and image guided adaptive brachytherapy (EMBRACE, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Guided Brachytherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer). Moreover, patient selection impedes the comparison of INTERLACE with other studies as the patients included in INTERLACE were younger, had better performance status, and had less advanced disease than in other studies. Notably patients with involved para-Aortic nodes were excluded. In this review, we discuss neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the frame of the EMBRACE studies and show how the impact of modern radiotherapy and patient selection affects the interpretation of the results of INTERLACE. This has led us to conclude that neoadjuvant chemotherapy is not needed for the majority of patients with cervical cancer treated with definitive modern radiotherapy, and may cause harm. However, it is possible that short course neoadjuvant chemotherapy may benefit a minor subgroup of patients who need to be identified. Comprehensive understanding, including cost utility analyses, are needed to draw conclusions regarding the potential benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in low and middle income countries with limited access to modern radiotherapy

Testicular shielding in penile brachytherapy

Abstract Purpose: Penile cancer, although rare, is one of the common genitourinary cancers in India affecting mostly aged uncircumcised males. For patients presenting with small superficial lesions < 3 cm restricted to glans, surgery, radical external radiation or brachytherapy may be offered, the latter being preferred as it allows organ and function preservation. In patients receiving brachytherapy, testicular morbidity is not commonly addressed. With an aim to minimize and document the doses to testis after adequate shielding during radical interstitial brachytherapy for penile cancers, we undertook this study in 2 patients undergoing brachytherapy and forms the basis of this report. Material and methods: Two patients with early stage penile cancer limited to the glans were treated with radical high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy using interstitial implant. A total of 7-8 tubes were implanted in two planes, parallel to the penile shaft. A total dose of 44-48 Gy (55-60 Gy EQD2 doses with α/β = 10) was delivered in 11-12 fractions of 4 Gy each delivered twice daily. Lead sheets adding to 11 mm (4-5 half value layer) were interposed between the penile shaft and scrotum. The testicular dose was measured using thermoluminescent dosimeters. For each patient, dosimetry was done for 3 fractions and mean calculated. Results: The cumulative testicular dose to left and right testis was 31.68 cGy and 42.79 cGy for patient A, and 21.96 cGy and 23.28 cGy for patient B. For the same patients, the mean cumulative dose measured at the posterior aspect of penile shaft was 722.15 cGy and 807.72 cGy, amounting to 16.4% and 16.8% of the prescribed dose. Hence, the application of lead shield 11 mm thick reduced testicular dose from 722-808 cGy to 21.96-42.57 cGy, an "absolute reduction" of 95.99 ± 1.5%. Conclusions: With the use of a simple lead shield as described, we were able to effectively reduce testicular dose from "spermicidal" range to "oligospermic" range with possible reversibility

Biomarker Expression and Clinical Outcomes in International Study of Chemoradiation and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Image-Guided Brachytherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer:BIOEMBRACE

Purpose: BIOEMBRACE was designed to study the impact of biomarkers in addition to clinicopathological factors on disease outcomes in patients treated with chemoradiation and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided brachytherapy (BT) for locally advanced cervical cancer in the EMBRACE study. Methods and Materials: Between 2018 and 2021, 8 EMBRACE-I sites contributed tumor tissue for the immunohistochemistry of p16, PD-L1, and L1CAM. These biomarkers and clinicopathological factors (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 stage, nodal status, histology, and necrosis on MRI) were analyzed to predict poor response at BT (high-risk clinical target volume [HR-CTV] ≥ 40 cc) at BT) and 5-year local control, pelvic control, and disease-free survival. Interaction between p16, PD-L1, radiation therapy dose (HR-CTV D90), and disease outcomes was investigated. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed. Results: Two hundred sixty-four patients were included. The median HR-CTV D90 was 89 Gy (86-95). P-16 positive status, PD-L1 &gt; 1%, and L1CAM ≥ 10% was noted in 86.6%, 20.1%, and 17.8% of patients, respectively. P16 negative status (odds ratio, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.0-5.7; P = .04) and necrosis on MRI (odds ratio, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.1-4.3; P &lt; .02) independently predicted for HR-CTV ≥ 40 cc, as did the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage and tumor width &gt;5 cm. PD-L1 &gt; 1% was associated with reduced local (82% vs 94%; P = .02) and pelvic control (79% vs 89%; P = .02). HR-CTV D90 &lt; 85 Gy was associated with inferior 5-year local control in p16-positive patients, especially if PD-L1 was coexpressed. On multivariable analysis, PD-L1 &gt; 1% was the only independent factor for 5-year local control (hazard ratio, 3.3; P = .04) and L1CAM ≥ 50% for pelvic control (hazard ratio, 5.5; 95% CI, 1.3-23.3; P = .02). Conclusions: P16 negative status and tumor necrosis on MRI are independently associated with poor response to chemoradiation, whereas PD-L1 &gt; 1% and L1CAM ≥ 50% have an independent impact on local and pelvic control, suggesting an impact of biomarker expression on outcomes. Further validation is needed.</p

Association Between the Regular Use of Vaginal Dilators and/or Sexual Activity and Vaginal Morbidity in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Survivors:An EMBRACE-I Study Report

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to provide risk estimations for vaginal morbidity with regard to vaginal dilation (summarizing the use of dilators and/or sexual activity) in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with definitive radiochemotherapy and image guided adaptive brachytherapy within the prospective, multi-institutional EMBRACE-I study.METHODS AND MATERIALS: Physician-assessed vaginal morbidity (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0), use of vaginal dilators, and patient-reported sexual activity (EORTC-CX24) were prospectively assessed at baseline and during regular follow-ups. Frequency analysis for vaginal dilation was performed in a subcohort of patients with ≥3 follow-ups. Regular dilation was defined if reported in ≥50% of follow-ups, and no/infrequent dilation if reported in &lt;50%. Actuarial estimates were calculated with Kaplan-Meier method; comparisons were evaluated with the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regressions were used to evaluate risk factors for vaginal stenosis G≥2.RESULTS: The EMBRACE-I study included a total of 1416 patients (2008-2015); 882 were evaluated in the present report with a median follow-up of 60 months. Of those, 565 (64%) reported regular dilation. This was associated with a significantly lower 5-year risk of vaginal stenosis G≥2 compared with no/infrequent dilation (23% vs 37%, P ≤ .001). This univariate finding was confirmed by multivariable analysis, after adjusting for other risk factors (hazard ratio, 0.630; P = .001). Regular vaginal dilation was also associated with a significantly higher risk for vaginal dryness G≥1 (72% vs 67%, P = .028) and bleeding G≥1 (61% vs 34%, P ≤ .001).CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal stenosis represents irreversible fibrotic changes that can cause pain during gynecologic examination and dyspareunia in locally advanced cervical cancer patients survivors. Regular vaginal dilation (defined as the use of dilators and/or sexual activity) is associated with a significantly lower risk for G≥2 vaginal stenosis, suggesting a potential improvement of vaginal patency. It is also associated with a significantly higher risk for mild G≥1 dryness and bleeding (no higher risk for G≥2), which can be clinically managed.</p

ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines for the management of patients with cervical cancer - Update 2023∗

In 2018, the European Society of Gynecological Oncology (ESGO) jointly with the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) published evidence-based guidelines for the management of patients with cervical cancer. Given the large body of new evidence addressing the management of cervical cancer, the three sister societies jointly decided to update these evidence-based guidelines. The update includes new topics to provide comprehensive guidelines on all relevant issues of diagnosis and treatment in cervical cancer.To serve on the expert panel (27 experts across Europe) ESGO/ESTRO/ESP nominated practicing clinicians who are involved in managing patients with cervical cancer and have demonstrated leadership through their expertise in clinical care and research, national and international engagement, profile, and dedication to the topics addressed. To ensure the statements were evidence based, new data identified from a systematic search was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgment was based on the professional experience and consensus of the international development group. Before publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 155 independent international practitioners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives.These updated guidelines are comprehensive and cover staging, management, follow-up, long-term survivorship, quality of life and palliative care. Management includes fertility sparing treatment, early and locally advanced cervical cancer, invasive cervical cancer diagnosed on a simple hysterectomy specimen, cervical cancer in pregnancy, rare tumors, recurrent and metastatic diseases. The management algorithms and the principles of radiotherapy and pathological evaluation are also defined

ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines for the management of patients with cervical cancer – Update 2023*

Funding Information: Open access publishing supported by the National Technical Library in Prague. Funding Information: The authors thank ESGO, ESTRO, and ESP for their support. The authors also thank the 155 international reviewers (physicians and patient representatives, see Appendix 2 ) for their valuable comments and suggestions. The authors thank the ESGO office, especially Kamila Macku, Tereza Cicakova, and Kateřina Šibravová, provided invaluable logistical and administrative support throughout the process. Publisher Copyright: © 2023, ESGO, ESTRO, ESP.In 2018, the European Society of Gynecological Oncology (ESGO) jointly with the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) published evidence-based guidelines for the management of patients with cervical cancer. Given the large body of new evidence addressing the management of cervical cancer, the three sister societies jointly decided to update these evidence-based guidelines. The update includes new topics to provide comprehensive guidelines on all relevant issues of diagnosis and treatment in cervical cancer. To serve on the expert panel (27 experts across Europe) ESGO/ESTRO/ESP nominated practicing clinicians who are involved in managing patients with cervical cancer and have demonstrated leadership through their expertise in clinical care and research, national and international engagement, profile, and dedication to the topics addressed. To ensure the statements were evidence based, new data identified from a systematic search was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgment was based on the professional experience and consensus of the international development group. Before publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 155 independent international practitioners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives. These updated guidelines are comprehensive and cover staging, management, follow-up, long-term survivorship, quality of life and palliative care. Management includes fertility sparing treatment, early and locally advanced cervical cancer, invasive cervical cancer diagnosed on a simple hysterectomy specimen, cervical cancer in pregnancy, rare tumors, recurrent and metastatic diseases. The management algorithms and the principles of radiotherapy and pathological evaluation are also defined.publishersversionpublishe