On the "spin-freezing" mechanism in underdoped superconducting cuprates

The letter deals with the spin-freezing process observed by means of NMR-NQR relaxation or by muon spin rotation in underdoped cuprate superconductors. This phenomenon, sometimes referred as coexistence of antiferromagnetic and superconducting order parameters, is generally thought to result from randomly distributed magnetic moments related to charge inhomogeneities (possibly stripes) which exhibit slowing down of their fluctuations on cooling below T$_c$ . Instead, we describe the experimental findings as due to fluctuating, vortex-antivortex, orbital currents state coexisting with d-wave superconducting state. A direct explanation of the experimental results, in underdoped Y$_{1-x}$Ca$_x$Ba$_2$Cu$_3$O$_{6.1}$ and La$_{2-x}$Sr$$CuO$_4$, is thus given in terms of freezing of orbital current fluctuations

Temperature Dependence of the Cu(2) NQR Line Width in YBa2_2Cu3_3O7−y_{7-y}

Systematic measurements of the $^{63}$Cu(2) NQR line width were performed in underdoped YBa$_2$Cu$_3$O$_{7-y}$ samples over the temperature range 4.2 K $<T<300$ K. It was shown that the copper NQR line width monotonically increases upon lowering temperature in the below-critical region, resembling temperature behavior of the superconducting gap. The observed dependence is explained by the fact that the energy of a condensate of sliding charge-current states of the charge-density-wave type depends on the phase of order parameter. Calculations show that this dependence appears only at $T<T_c$. Quantitative estimates of the line broadening at $T<T_c$ agree with the measurement results.Comment: 4 pages, 2 figure

Angular resolved specific heat in iron-based superconductors: the case for nodeless extended ss-wave gap

We consider the variation of the field-induced component of the specific heat $C({\bf H})$ with the direction of the applied field in $Fe-$pnictides within quasi-classical Doppler-shift approximation, with special emphasis to recent experiments on FeSe$_{0.4}$Te$_{0.6}$ [Zheng et al., arXiv:1004.2236]. We show that for extended $s-$wave gap with no nodes, $C({\bf H})$ has $\cos 4 \phi$ component, where $\phi$ is the angle between ${\bf H}$ and the direction between hole and electron Fermi surfaces. The maxima of $C({\bf H})$ are at $\pi/4$, $3\pi/4$, etc. if the applied field is smaller than $H_0 \leq 1T$, and at $\phi =0, \pi/2$, etc. if the applied field is larger than $H_0$. The angle-dependence of $C({\bf H})$, the positions of the maxima, and the relative magnitude of the oscillating component are consistent with the experiments performed in the field of $9T >> H_0$. We show that the observed $\cos 4 \phi$ variation does not hold if the $s-$wave gap has accidental nodes along the two electron Fermi surfaces.Comment: 5 pages, 4 figure

Magnetic degeneracy and hidden metallicity of the spin density wave state in ferropnictides

We analyze spin density wave (SDW) order in iron-based superconductors and electronic structure in the SDW phase. We consider an itinerant model for Fe-pnictides with two hole bands centered at $(0,0)$ and two electron bands centered at $(0,\pi)$ and $(\pi,0)$ in the unfolded BZ. A SDW order in such a model is generally a combination of two components with momenta $(0,\pi)$ and $(\pi,0)$, both yield $(\pi,\pi)$ order in the folded zone. Neutron experiments, however, indicate that only one component is present. We show that $(0,\pi)$ or $(\pi,0)$ order is selected if we assume that only one hole band is involved in the SDW mixing with electron bands. A SDW order in such 3-band model is highly degenerate for a perfect nesting and hole-electron interaction only, but we show that ellipticity of electron pockets and interactions between electron bands break the degeneracy and favor the desired $(0,\pi)$ or $(\pi,0)$ order. We further show that stripe-ordered system remains a metal for arbitrary coupling. We analyze electronic structure for parameters relevant to the pnictides and argue that the resulting electronic structure is in good agreement with ARPES experiments. We discuss the differences between our model and $J_1-J_2$ model of localized spins.Comment: reference list updated, typos are correcte