584 research outputs found
Extensions in graph normal form
Graph normal form, introduced earlier for propositional logic, is shown to be a normal form also for first-order logic. It allows to view syntax of theories as digraphs, while their semantics as kernels of these digraphs. Graphs are particularly well suited for studying circularity, and we provide some general means for verifying that circular or apparently circular extensions are conservative. Traditional syntactic means of ensuring conservativity, like definitional extensions or positive occurrences guaranteeing exsitence of fixed points, emerge as special cases.publishedVersio
Paradoxes versus Contradictions in Logic of Sentential Operators
Classical logic, of first or higher order, is extended with sentential operators and quantifiers, interpreted substitutionally over unrestricted substitution class. Operators mark a single layered, consistent metalanguage. Self-reference, arising from substitutional quantification over sentences, allows to express paradoxes which, unlike contradictions, do not lead to explosion. Semantics of the resulting language, using semi-kernels of digraphs, is non-explosive yet two-valued and has classical semantics as a special case for clasically consistent theories. A complete reasoning is obtained by extending LK with two rules for sentential quantifiers. Adding (cut) yields a complete system for the explosive semantics
Modalities as interactions between the classical and the intuitionistic logics
We give an equivalent formulation of topological algebras, interpreting S4, as boolean algebras equipped with intuitionistic negation. The intuitionistic substructure—Heyting algebra—of such an algebra can be then seen as an “epistemic subuniverse”, and modalities arise from the interaction between the intuitionistic and classical negations or, we might perhaps say, between the epistemic and the ontological aspects: they are not relations between arbitrary alternatives but between intuitionistic substructures and one common world governed by the classical (propositional) logic. As an example of the generality of the obtained view, we apply it also to S5. We give a sound, complete and decidable sequent calculus, extending a classical system with the rules for handling the intuitionistic negation, in which one can prove all classical, intuitionistic and S4 valid sequents
Conformal mappings on the Grushin plane
We study conformal mappings in the Grushin plane and provide a number of
their characterizations in terms of the Sobolev mappings and their geometry.
Furthermore, we connect conformality on the Grushin plane with conformality on
the complex plane by using the Meyerson map. Among applications we discuss
admissible curves and length-distortion estimates in the Grushin plane, as well
as the Carath\'eodory extension theorem.Comment: 16 pages, 4 figure
There are only two paradoxes
Using a graph representation of classical logic, the paper shows that the
liar or Yablo pattern occurs in every semantic paradox. The core graph
theoretic result generalizes theorem of Richardson, showing solvability of
finite graphs without odd cycles, to arbitrary graphs which are proven solvable
when no odd cycles nor patterns generalizing Yablo's occur. This follows from
an earlier result by a new compactness-like theorem, holding for infinitary
logic and utilizing the graph representation.Comment: 7 pages, submitted to a journa
Paradoxes versus Contradictions in Logic of Sentential Operators
Classical logic, of first or higher order, is extended with sentential operators and quantifiers, interpreted substitutionally over unrestricted substitution class. Operators mark a single layered, consistent metalanguage. Self-reference, arising from substitutional quantification over sentences, allows to express paradoxes which, unlike contradictions, do not lead to explosion. Semantics of the resulting language, using semi-kernels of digraphs, is non-explosive yet two-valued and has classical semantics as a special case for clasically consistent theories. A complete reasoning is obtained by extending LK with two rules for sentential quantifiers. Adding (cut) yields a complete system for the explosive semantics.publishedVersio
- …
