Non-tuberculous mycobacteria disease pre-lung transplantation:A systematic review of the treatment regimens and duration pre- and post-transplant

Background: There is lack of consensus on non-tuberculous mycobacteria pulmonary disease (NTM-PD) treatment regimen and duration in patient listed for lung transplantation (LTx). We conducted a systematic review on treatment regimen and duration pre- and directly post-LTx, for patients with known NTM-PD pre-LTx. Additionally, we searched for risk factors for NTM disease development post-LTx and for mortality.Methods: Literature was reviewed on PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library, for articles published from inception to January 2022. Individual patient data were sought.Results: Sixteen studies were included reporting 92 patients. Most frequent used agents were aminoglycosides and macrolides for Mycobacterium abscessus (M. abscessus) and macrolides and tuberculostatic agents for Mycobacterium avium complex (M. avium complex). The median treatment duration pre-LTx was 10 months (IQR 6–17) and 2 months (IQR 2–8) directly post-LTx. Longer treatment duration pre-LTx was observed in children and in patients with M. abscessus. 46% of the patients with NTM-PD pre-LTx developed NTM disease post-LTx, related mortality rate was 10%. Longer treatment duration pre-LTx (p < 0.001) and sputum non-conversion pre-LTx (p = 0.003) were significantly associated with development of NTM-disease post-LTx. Longer treatment duration pre-LTx (p = 0.004), younger age (p < 0.001) and sputum non-conversion (p = 0.044) were risk factors for NTM related death.Conclusions: The median treatment duration pre-LTx was 10 months (IQR 6–17) and 2 months (IQR 2–8) directly post-LTx. Patients with longer treatment duration for NTM-PD pre-LTx and with sputum non-conversion are at risk for NTM disease post-LTx and for NTM-related death. Children were particularly at risk for NTM related death

Clofazimine as a substitute for rifampicin improves efficacy of Mycobacterium avium pulmonary disease treatment in the hollow-fiber model

AMycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease is treated with an azithromycin, ethambutol, and rifampicin regimen, with limited efficacy. The role of rifampicin is controversial due to inactivity, adverse effects, and drug interactions. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of clofazimine as a substitute for rifampicin in an intracellular hollow-fiber infection model. THP-1 cells, which are monocytes isolated from peripheral blood from an acute monocytic leukemia patient, were infected with M. avium ATCC 700898 and exposed to a regimen of azithromycin and ethambutol with either rifampicin or clofazimine. Intrapulmonary pharmacokinetic profiles of azithromycin, ethambutol, and rifampicin were simulated. For clofazimine, a steady-state average concentration was targeted. Drug concentrations and bacterial densities were monitored over 21 days. Exposures to azithromycin and ethambutol were 20%–40% lower than targeted but within clinically observed ranges. Clofazimine exposures were 1.7 times higher than targeted. Until day 7, both regimens were able to maintain stasis. Thereafter, regrowth was observed for the rifampicin-containing regimen, while the clofazimine-containing regimen yielded a 2 Log10 colony forming unit (CFU) per mL decrease in bacterial load. The clofazimine regimen also successfully suppressed the emergence of macrolide tolerance. In summary, substitution of rifampicin with clofazimine in the hollow-fiber model improved the antimycobacterial activity of the regimen. Clofazimine-containing regimens merit investigation in clinical trials

Management of Drug Toxicity in Mycobacterium avium Complex Pulmonary Disease:An Expert Panel Survey

Adverse events are frequent in nontuberculous mycobacteria pulmonary disease treatment, but evidence to support their management is scarce. An expert panel survey on management of adverse events shows consistent opinions on management of hepatoxicity, ocular toxicity, ototoxicity, tinnitus, and gastrointestinal upset. These opinions can provide assistance in individual patient management decisions.</p

Mycobacterium xenopi Clinical Relevance and Determinants, the Netherlands

Clinical isolation of M. xenopi represents true infection in 51% of cases; genotype is a major determinant

Dysregulated innate and adaptive immune responses discriminate disease severity in COVID-19

The clinical spectrum of COVID-19 varies and the differences in host response characterizing this variation have not been fully elucidated. COVID-19 disease severity correlates with an excessive pro-inflammatory immune response and profound lymphopenia. Inflammatory responses according to disease severity were explored by plasma cytokine measurements and proteomics analysis in 147 COVID-19 patients. Furthermore, peripheral blood mononuclear cell cytokine production assays and whole blood flow cytometry were performed. Results confirm a hyperinflammatory innate immune state, while highlighting hepatocyte growth factor and stem cell factor as potential biomarkers for disease severity. Clustering analysis reveals no specific inflammatory endotypes in COVID-19 patients. Functional assays reveal abrogated adaptive cytokine production (interferon-gamma, interleukin-17 and interleukin-22) and prominent T cell exhaustion in critically ill patients, whereas innate immune responses were intact or hyperresponsive. Collectively, this extensive analysis provides a comprehensive insight into the pathobiology of severe to critical COVID-19 and highlight potential biomarkers of disease severity

Additional file 1: of High mortality in patients with Mycobacterium avium complex lung disease: a systematic review

Search strategies. (DOCX 17 kb