Reduced pollution level and ecological risk of mercury-polluted sediment in a alkali-chlorine factory's brine water storage pond after corrective actions: A case study in Southern Taiwan

Mercury is a highly toxic pollutant and persistent in the sediment, which highlights the needs for remediation of sediment Hg pollution. However, the effects of remedial actions on the pollution and ecological risk of Hg in sediment are less investigated. Therefore, this study conducted an environmental risk assessment before and after corrective actions in the brine water storage pond of a closed alkali-chlorine plant with high Hg pollution in the sediment. The results showed that the accumulation of Hg in the sediment (2.59–443 mg/kg), fish and crabs (1.10–8.54 mg/kg) in the polluted pond was higher than the regulation limit in Taiwan. After implementing the corrective actions such as institutional/engineering control and remediation, we found that the Hg concentration and pollution factor (CF), in the sediment were significantly decreased by 74% and 73% (p=0.02), respectively. In addition, the geoaccumulation index (I-geo) were decreased to lower pollution class after corrective actions (p=0.009). The risk related indices such as potential ecological risk index (RI) and risk quotient (RQ) also showed significant decreases (p=0.03) after corrective actions (71% and 73%, respectively). Although the values of pollution and risk indices were still high after remediation, the results of this study demonstrated the effectiveness of corrective actions on amelioration of sediment Hg pollution. It suggests that corrective actions should be continuously implemented to reduce the pollution and risk levels in all aspects to an acceptable level for stakeholders

The impact of surgical delay on resectability of colorectal cancer: An international prospective cohort study

AIM: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has provided a unique opportunity to explore the impact of surgical delays on cancer resectability. This study aimed to compare resectability for colorectal cancer patients undergoing delayed versus non-delayed surgery. METHODS: This was an international prospective cohort study of consecutive colorectal cancer patients with a decision for curative surgery (January-April 2020). Surgical delay was defined as an operation taking place more than 4 weeks after treatment decision, in a patient who did not receive neoadjuvant therapy. A subgroup analysis explored the effects of delay in elective patients only. The impact of longer delays was explored in a sensitivity analysis. The primary outcome was complete resection, defined as curative resection with an R0 margin. RESULTS: Overall, 5453 patients from 304 hospitals in 47 countries were included, of whom 6.6% (358/5453) did not receive their planned operation. Of the 4304 operated patients without neoadjuvant therapy, 40.5% (1744/4304) were delayed beyond 4 weeks. Delayed patients were more likely to be older, men, more comorbid, have higher body mass index and have rectal cancer and early stage disease. Delayed patients had higher unadjusted rates of complete resection (93.7% vs. 91.9%, P = 0.032) and lower rates of emergency surgery (4.5% vs. 22.5%, P < 0.001). After adjustment, delay was not associated with a lower rate of complete resection (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.90-1.55, P = 0.224), which was consistent in elective patients only (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.69-1.27, P = 0.672). Longer delays were not associated with poorer outcomes. CONCLUSION: One in 15 colorectal cancer patients did not receive their planned operation during the first wave of COVID-19. Surgical delay did not appear to compromise resectability, raising the hypothesis that any reduction in long-term survival attributable to delays is likely to be due to micro-metastatic disease

In Vivo Ectopic Implantation Model to Assess Human Mesenchymal Progenitor Cell Potential

Clinical interest on human mesenchymal progenitor cells (hMPC) relies on their potential applicability in cell-based therapies. An in vitro characterization is usually performed in order to define MPC potency. However, in vitro predictions not always correlate with in vivo results and thus there is no consensus in how to really assess cell potency. Our goal was to provide an in vivo testing method to define cell behavior before therapeutic usage, especially for bone tissue engineering applications. In this context, we wondered whether bone marrow stromal cells (hBMSC) would proceed in an osteogenic microenvironment. Based on previous approaches, we developed a fibrin/ceramic/BMP-2/hBMSCs compound. We implanted the compound during only 2 weeks in NOD-SCID mice, either orthotopically to assess its osteoinductive property or subcutaneously to analyze its adequacy as a cell potency testing method. Using fluorescent cell labeling and immunohistochemistry techniques, we could ascertain cell differentiation to bone, bone marrow, cartilage, adipocyte and fibrous tissue. We observed differences in cell potential among different batches of hBMSCs, which did not strictly correlate with in vitro analyses. Our data indicate that the method we have developed is reliable, rapid and reproducible to define cell potency, and may be useful for testing cells destined to bone tissue engineering purposes. Additionally, results obtained with hMPCs from other sources indicate that our method is suitable for testing any potentially implantable mesenchymal cell. Finally, we propose that this model could successfully be employed for bone marrow niche and bone tumor studies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12015-013-9464-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users