Quality of Life in Sarcopenia and Frailty

The reduced muscle mass and impaired muscle performance that define sarcopenia in older individuals are associated with increased risk of physical limitation and a variety of chronic diseases. They may also contribute to clinical frailty. A gradual erosion of quality of life (QoL) has been evidenced in these individuals, although much of this research has been done using generic QoL instruments, particularly the SF-36, which may not be ideal in older populations with significant comorbidities. This review and report of an expert meeting presents the current definitions of these geriatric syndromes (sarcopenia and frailty). It then briefly summarizes QoL concepts and specificities in older populations and examines the relevant domains of QoL and what is known concerning QoL decline with these conditions. It calls for a clearer definition of the construct of disability, argues that a disease-specific QoL instrument for sarcopenia/frailty would be an asset for future research, and discusses whether there are available and validated components that could be used to this end and whether the psychometric properties of these instruments are sufficiently tested. It calls also for an approach using utility weighting to provide some cost estimates and suggests that a time trade-off study could be appropriat

Recherche et innovation thérapeutique, une ambition partagée

Qu’est-ce qu’un médicament ? Comment le fabrique-t-on ? Comment passe-t-on d’un produit de la chimie à l’identification d’une molécule biologiquement active, puis à un nouvel outil thérapeutique ? Comment interagissent, pour atteindre ce but, des équipes de chimistes, de biologistes et de médecins ? Comment la recherche académique et la recherche industrielle collaborent-elles et se complètent-elles ?Autant de questions bien (trop) souvent absentes des cursus universitaires, qu’ils soient scientifiques ou médicaux. C’est pour tenter d’y répondre que Servier, l’Inserm et le CNRS ont accepté de partager leur vision à travers une série de textes que médecine/sciences publiera dans les mois à venir et dont voici les premiers.Les enjeux de cette connaissance sont tout à la fois médicaux, économiques et éthiques. De la chimie à la biologie, de la galénique à la pharmacodynamique, de la physiopathologie à la méthodologie des essais cliniques, l’élaboration d’un médicament puise dans toutes ces disciplines qui participent à l’innovation thérapeutique

Effects of Intranasal 17β-Estradiol on Bone Turnover and Serum Insulin-Like Growth Factor I in Postmenopausal Women

Estrogen therapy, using either oral or transdermal routes, decreases bone turnover and prevents postmenopausal bone loss. It has been suggested that oral and transdermal 17β-estradiol (E2) may have different effects on serum insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), a potent bone-forming growth factor. In this study we investigated the effects of a new route of administration, the intranasal E2 spray (S21400), on bone turnover and circulating IGF-I and IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3). Four hundred and twenty early postmenopausal women (&amp;lt;5 yr since menopause; mean age, 52 yr) were enrolled in a 3-month, double blind, placebo-controlled study of four doses of intranasal E2 (100, 200, 300, and 400μ g/day), two doses of oral E2 valerate (1 or 2 mg/day), and placebo. One hundred and twelve women were further treated for 12 months with intranasal E2 (300 μg/day, i.e. the dose that has been shown to be adequate for the majority of postmenopausal women). Markers of bone resorption (urinary type I collagen C telopeptides) and formation [serum osteocalcin, serum type I collagen N-terminal extension propeptide (PINP), and serum bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP)] were measured at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 15 months. Serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3 were measured at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months. Urinary type I collagen C telopeptides decreased significantly in all active treatment groups as soon as 1 month (P &amp;lt; 0.001 vs. placebo) and continued to decrease at 3 months with a dose effect for intranasal E2. Serum osteocalcin and PINP did not change at 1 month for oral E2 (1 and 2 mg), but decreased significantly at 3 months. In contrast, formation markers increased significantly at 1 month for the two highest doses of intranasal E2 (P &amp;lt; 0.01 vs. placebo for osteocalcin and BAP) and did not decrease at 3 months. Oral E2 induced a marked decrease in circulating IGF-I as early as 1 month, which was amplified at 3 months (−29% and −32% for 1 and 2 mg, respectively), whereas no significant change from placebo was observed for intranasal E2 during the 3-month period. Changes in circulating IGF-I correlated significantly (P &amp;lt; 0.01) with changes in osteocalcin, PINP, and BAP at 3 months. Oral and intranasal E2 did not induce any significant change from placebo in serum IGFBP-3 at both 1 and 3 months. After 1 yr of treatment with intranasal E2 (300μ g/day), both resorption and formation markers decreased, reaching the levels in premenopausal women, regardless of the type of treatment during the first 3 months. We conclude that E2 administered by this new nasal route normalizes bone turnover to premenopausal levels. The delayed decrease in bone formation observed with intranasal E2 compared to oral E2 may be related to different effects on serum IGF-I levels.</jats:p

Recommendations for the registration of agents to be used in the prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: updated recommendations from the Group for the Respect of Ethics and Excellence in Science.

OBJECTIVES: The Group for the Respect and Excellence in Science (GREES) has reviewed and updated their recommendations for clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of new chemical entities to be used in the treatment and prevention of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP). METHODS: Consensus discussion of the committee. RESULTS: With the exception of steroid use posttransplantation, there is no need to differentiate between underlying diseases. Prevention and treatment for GIOP are dependent on exposure to glucocorticoids rather than T-scores as in postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO). If fracture data are obtained for PMO, it need not be repeated for GIOP, relying instead on bone mineral density (BMD) trials of at least 1 year. GREES recommends several changes in the previous guidance for GIOP. The committee saw no need to repeat preclinical studies if those have been previously done to assure bone quality in PMO. Similarly, phase I and phase II trials, if careful dose selection has been done for PMO, should not be repeated. The "prevention" and "treatment" claims should remain. Since the most recent evidence suggests significant increase in fracture risk for daily doses of prednisone of 5 mg/day or equivalent, clinical trials should concentrate on patients receiving at least this daily dosage. The emergence of bisphosphonates as the reference treatment, together with the rapid bone loss and high fracture incidence in glucocorticoid users, necessitates recommending a noninferiority trial design with lumbar spine BMD as the primary endpoint after 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Registration of new chemical entities to be used in the management of GIOP should be granted, based on a 1-year noninferiority trial, using BMD as primary outcome and alendronate or risedronate as comparator. Demonstration of antifracture efficacy should have been previously demonstrated in PMO