Improved prediction of RNA secondary structure by integrating the free energy model with restraints derived from experimental probing data.

PublishedEvaluation StudiesJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tRecently, several experimental techniques have emerged for probing RNA structures based on high-throughput sequencing. However, most secondary structure prediction tools that incorporate probing data are designed and optimized for particular types of experiments. For example, RNAstructure-Fold is optimized for SHAPE data, while SeqFold is optimized for PARS data. Here, we report a new RNA secondary structure prediction method, restrained MaxExpect (RME), which can incorporate multiple types of experimental probing data and is based on a free energy model and an MEA (maximizing expected accuracy) algorithm. We first demonstrated that RME substantially improved secondary structure prediction with perfect restraints (base pair information of known structures). Next, we collected structure-probing data from diverse experiments (e.g. SHAPE, PARS and DMS-seq) and transformed them into a unified set of pairing probabilities with a posterior probabilistic model. By using the probability scores as restraints in RME, we compared its secondary structure prediction performance with two other well-known tools, RNAstructure-Fold (based on a free energy minimization algorithm) and SeqFold (based on a sampling algorithm). For SHAPE data, RME and RNAstructure-Fold performed better than SeqFold, because they markedly altered the energy model with the experimental restraints. For high-throughput data (e.g. PARS and DMS-seq) with lower probing efficiency, the secondary structure prediction performances of the tested tools were comparable, with performance improvements for only a portion of the tested RNAs. However, when the effects of tertiary structure and protein interactions were removed, RME showed the highest prediction accuracy in the DMS-accessible regions by incorporating in vivo DMS-seq data.National Key Basic Research Program of China [2012CB316503]; National High-Tech Research and Development Program of China [2014AA021103]; National Natural Science Foundation of China [31271402]; Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program [2014z21045]; Hong Kong Research Grants Council Early Career Scheme [419612 to K.Y.]; National Science Foundation [1339282 to D.H.M.]; Computing Platform of the National Protein Facilities (Tsinghua University). Funding for open access charge: National Natural Science Foundation of China [31271402]

Exercise and the Prevention of Oesophageal Cancer (EPOC) study protocol: a randomized controlled trial of exercise versus stretching in males with Barrett's oesophagus

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and excessive body fat are considered principal causes of Barrett's oesophagus (a metaplastic change in the cells lining the oesophagus) and its neoplastic progression, oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Metabolic disturbances including altered levels of obesity-related cytokines, chronic inflammation and insulin resistance have also been associated with oesophageal cancer development, especially in males. Physical activity may have the potential to abrogate metabolic disturbances in males with Barrett's oesophagus and elicit beneficial reductions in body fat and gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms. Thus, exercise may be an effective intervention in reducing oesophageal adenocarcinoma risk. However, to date this hypothesis remains untested.</p> <p>The 'Exercise and the Prevention of Oesophageal Cancer Study' will determine whether 24 weeks of exercise training will lead to alterations in risk factors or biomarkers for oesophageal adenocarcinoma in males with Barrett's oesophagus. Our primary outcomes are serum concentrations of leptin, adiponectin, tumour necrosis factor-alpha, C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 as well as insulin resistance. Body composition, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms, cardiovascular fitness and muscular strength will also be assessed as secondary outcomes.</p> <p>Methods/Design</p> <p>A randomized controlled trial of 80 overweight or obese, inactive males with Barrett's oesophagus will be conducted in Brisbane, Australia. Participants will be randomized to an intervention arm (60 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic and resistance training, five days per week) or a control arm (45 minutes of stretching, five days per week) for 24 weeks. Primary and secondary endpoints will be measured at baseline (week 0), midpoint (week 12) and at the end of the intervention (week 24).</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>Due to the increasing incidence and very high mortality associated with oesophageal adenocarcinoma, interventions effective in preventing the progression of Barrett's oesophagus are urgently needed. We propose that exercise may be successful in reducing oesophageal adenocarcinoma risk. This primary prevention trial will also provide information on whether the protective association between physical activity and cancer is causal.</p> <p>Trial Registration</p> <p>ACTRN12609000401257</p

Progressive protocol in the bowel management of spinal cord injuries.

Research into bowel management in spinal cord injury is sparse. Specifically, the use of laxatives in this group, while widespread, is not supported by research evidence. A prospective study in which baseline and intervention data were collected from each subject was undertaken with 17 individuals. The baseline was the routine method of bowel management in the study unit. The intervention was the use of a progressive protocol which allowed the use of physical interventions and rectal stimulants prior to the use of laxative therapy if required. Though the response of individuals varied, the number of successful bowel management episodes employing laxatives was significantly less in the intervention phase, the proportion of glycerine suppository uses which were successful was significantly greater, the use of manual evacuation was significantly reduced and the duration of bowel management episodes was significantly less. These findings suggest that use of laxatives in bowel management is not essential for all newly spinal cord injured individuals, while the use of physical interventions in this population may be beneficial. The variable response of individuals to the progressive protocol highlights the need for individual assessment in the area of bowel. The findings of this small study must be validated by a larger study