49 research outputs found
Neural reflex regulation of arterial pressure in pathophysiological conditions: interplay among the baroreflex, the cardiopulmonary reflexes and the chemoreflex
Acute cerebral hemorrhage normalized plasma renin activity in a patient with primary aldosteronism
Comparison of Efficacy of Intensive versus Mild Pitavastatin Therapy on Lipid and Inflammation Biomarkers in Hypertensive Patients with Dyslipidemia
OBJECTIVE: Intensive as compared to mild statin therapy has been proven to be superior in improving cardiovascular outcome, whereas the effects of intensive statin therapy on inflammation and lipoprotein biomarkers are not well defined. METHODS: This study assigned essential hypertensive patients with dyslipidemia to 6 months administration of mild (1 mg/day, n = 34) or intensive pitavastatin therapy (4 mg/day, n = 29), and various lipid and inflammation biomarkers were measured at baseline, and 3 and 6 months after the start of treatment. RESULTS: Both pitavastatin doses were well tolerated, and there were no serious treatment-related adverse events. After 6 months, significant improvements in total cholesterol, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein (LDL-) cholesterol, LDL/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL/HDL), apolipoproteins B, C-II, and E, apolipoprotein-B/apolipoprotein-A-I (Apo B/Apo A-I), and malondialdehyde (MDA-) LDL were observed in both groups. Compared with the mild pitavastatin group, the intensive pitavastatin therapy showed significantly greater decreases in C reactive protein (F = 3.76, p<0.05), total cholesterol (F = 10.65), LDL-cholesterol (F = 23.37), LDL/HDL (F = 12.34), apolipoproteins B (F = 19.07) and E (F = 6.49), Apo B/Apo A-I (F = 13.26), and MDA-LDL (F = 5.76) (p<0.01, respectively). CONCLUSION: Intensive pitavastatin therapy may have a more favorable effect not only in decreasing LDL-cholesterol but also in pleiotropic benefits in terms of improvement of apolipoproteins, inflammation, or oxidation
Hypertension in women
Hypertension is an important modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality, and a highly prevalent condition in both men and women. However, the prevalence of hypertension is predicted to increase more among women than men. Combined oral contraceptives (COCs) can induce hypertension in a small group of women and, increase CV risk especially among those with hypertension. Both COC-related increased CV risk and blood pressure (BP) returns to pretreatment levels by 3 months of its discontinuation. The effects of menopause and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on BP are controversial, and COCs and HRT containing the new generation progestin drospirenone are preferred in women with established hypertension. Despite the high incidence of cancer in women, CV disease remains the major cause of death in women and comparable benefit of antihypertensive treatment have been demonstrated in both women and men
